Good project in Java tech.
Less work, as it depends on the project.
We had an aptitude test, then a group discussion, followed by a technical round, and finally the HR round. Interviews were very cooperative and friendly. They accepted answers without any rejection or dissatisfaction. Overall, it was a good experien
The interview was an overall good experience. The technical round and coding questions were quite standard. However, I had a bad experience with the recruiter (i.e., the point of contact HR team). One of them was so arrogant with me. It was as if I
There were two rounds. The first was an aptitude round with three sections: * The first section had 18 questions on number series. * The next 18 covered proportions, percentages, and time and distance. * The last 18 were verbal questions. For
We had an aptitude test, then a group discussion, followed by a technical round, and finally the HR round. Interviews were very cooperative and friendly. They accepted answers without any rejection or dissatisfaction. Overall, it was a good experien
The interview was an overall good experience. The technical round and coding questions were quite standard. However, I had a bad experience with the recruiter (i.e., the point of contact HR team). One of them was so arrogant with me. It was as if I
There were two rounds. The first was an aptitude round with three sections: * The first section had 18 questions on number series. * The next 18 covered proportions, percentages, and time and distance. * The last 18 were verbal questions. For