Many smart and hard-working individual contributors. It was a decent place to work in the early to mid-2000s.
Weak and short-sighted upper management. Lack of ethical and transparent middle and upper management. Too much back-stabbing and turf-grabbing. The yearly review process is a scam. The merit increases are a woeful joke. Much lower pay compared to the rest of the industry.
Even though I left voluntarily, the next round of cuts should come at the VP level and above. The company is way too top-heavy and full of low-hanging fruit to prune.
15-minute conversation, going through CV. Asked a few questions about technologies used in the past, but no technical or competency-based questions. Fully remote job, with an opportunity but no obligation to attend the office of choice (UK).
It was a typical interview. First, communication was a phone screen. Then, there was one round of technical interview. After that, there was another round with an interview. The overall process took approximately six weeks.
The process is very simple and basic. It involves one technical and one HR round. Mostly, questions are based on your experience and skills. Domain knowledge is most important. Additional skills are welcome for the position.
15-minute conversation, going through CV. Asked a few questions about technologies used in the past, but no technical or competency-based questions. Fully remote job, with an opportunity but no obligation to attend the office of choice (UK).
It was a typical interview. First, communication was a phone screen. Then, there was one round of technical interview. After that, there was another round with an interview. The overall process took approximately six weeks.
The process is very simple and basic. It involves one technical and one HR round. Mostly, questions are based on your experience and skills. Domain knowledge is most important. Additional skills are welcome for the position.