On my team, there is a good work-life balance, and it is generally low-stress. I'm also fairly well compensated.
It's a large company, so there can be some bureaucracy.
My role isn't very challenging, with little room for innovation.
I also seem to have a fair number of incompetent colleagues.
A lot of legacy code.
Be more involved with what your employees are doing and have measurable or quantifiable ways to judge performance. Also, the interview process could be more rigorous.
The interview process was pretty standard. It was mostly technical, with questions mainly focusing on data structure concepts. The initial assessment was an online assessment, and within a week, I received a call from a resource person.
I was told during the interview that IBM's efforts/focus to have a diverse workforce was only about money, and that they wouldn't be doing it unless it was profitable. This felt dehumanizing and made me feel like a 'token' person being interviewed a
The interview process included two behavioral interviews and a technical interview. The interviewer was late for my technical interview and did not have time to complete the technical assessment. He stumbled through my resume and asked trivial ques
The interview process was pretty standard. It was mostly technical, with questions mainly focusing on data structure concepts. The initial assessment was an online assessment, and within a week, I received a call from a resource person.
I was told during the interview that IBM's efforts/focus to have a diverse workforce was only about money, and that they wouldn't be doing it unless it was profitable. This felt dehumanizing and made me feel like a 'token' person being interviewed a
The interview process included two behavioral interviews and a technical interview. The interviewer was late for my technical interview and did not have time to complete the technical assessment. He stumbled through my resume and asked trivial ques