Good technology acumen within an organization.
The middle leadership layer is too thick.
The interview had two technical rounds plus a final HR round. The first round was with an Architect, the second round was with a Principal Architect, and the interview duration was also mostly similar for both. Finally, there was a round with the HR
The process was very straightforward. It was a two-interview process, as it should be, unlike other companies that require three or more interviews. The team at IBM knows what they want and has an eye for picking the right candidates. This is unlike
The interview process was very hard because they don't have internal alignment. After that, we had a 1:1 interview and a test about our skills. I waited a lot to make the interview about my experience. The result was not good.
The interview had two technical rounds plus a final HR round. The first round was with an Architect, the second round was with a Principal Architect, and the interview duration was also mostly similar for both. Finally, there was a round with the HR
The process was very straightforward. It was a two-interview process, as it should be, unlike other companies that require three or more interviews. The team at IBM knows what they want and has an eye for picking the right candidates. This is unlike
The interview process was very hard because they don't have internal alignment. After that, we had a 1:1 interview and a test about our skills. I waited a lot to make the interview about my experience. The result was not good.