Good resources for learning, but risk-taking is not encouraged.
Few engineers are really good at their job and connect. Mediocre ones know how to blame and play politics.
Not a competitive pay package.
Even if work hours are almost 60 hours every week, it's not a rewarding experience.
The company is consistently failing to capture the market/customers. Hence, projects tanked after working so hard.
Little to no work-life balance.
Management needs to change up.
Persistently chooses underqualified managers who lack leadership skills. People management and petty politics are never-ending.
It started with a 1-hour phone interview. I was asked the basics of cache, memory, FIFOs, and a little bit of C++ like OOPs, etc. Then I was called onsite for an interview at the Folsom campus.
The interview was smooth. Questions were tricky and related to the job at hand. The interviewer was well-versed with the concepts. He also had an open talk related to the topic to gauge your interest.
The interview process took two weeks. First was a 30-minute phone interview, followed by one onsite interview with four rounds. The process happened faster as I was in Arizona itself. The manager was very calm and kind, and the panel was a very pos
It started with a 1-hour phone interview. I was asked the basics of cache, memory, FIFOs, and a little bit of C++ like OOPs, etc. Then I was called onsite for an interview at the Folsom campus.
The interview was smooth. Questions were tricky and related to the job at hand. The interviewer was well-versed with the concepts. He also had an open talk related to the topic to gauge your interest.
The interview process took two weeks. First was a 30-minute phone interview, followed by one onsite interview with four rounds. The process happened faster as I was in Arizona itself. The manager was very calm and kind, and the panel was a very pos