Good benefits, excellent intra-company mobility.
Constant re-orgs, heavy bureaucracy, poorly trained managers, heavy-handed DEI policies (openly retarding career advancement for unfavored folks, quietly providing free/out-of-cycle promotions for favored folks, racially biased hiring), pay is not industry-leading, work/life unbalance, "emergency time" is all the time, constant project thrash.
If you want to make the company more efficient, reduce the bureaucracy and project thrash. Once these are less impactful, you'll need fewer people. If you just reduce the head count and keep everything, you are just going to crush those dumb enough to stay (this is what they are currently doing).
It was a phone interview. They asked some questions about my resume and then some technical questions. A week or two later, I received an email from HR.
They asked personal questions, requested a translation of an article from English to Hebrew, and kept making the questions increasingly difficult each time. Two easy-level LeetCode questions and one medium-level question were presented.
My interview process for a validation engineer started with a 30-minute phone interview with the hiring manager. We discussed my background and current role. He also briefly went into what the posted job entailed and the type of expertise he was look
It was a phone interview. They asked some questions about my resume and then some technical questions. A week or two later, I received an email from HR.
They asked personal questions, requested a translation of an article from English to Hebrew, and kept making the questions increasingly difficult each time. Two easy-level LeetCode questions and one medium-level question were presented.
My interview process for a validation engineer started with a 30-minute phone interview with the hiring manager. We discussed my background and current role. He also briefly went into what the posted job entailed and the type of expertise he was look