Intuit Edmonton has a relatively good development culture compared to other tech companies located in Edmonton.
Still have the "re-org" word each year.
Intuit Edmonton's management and promotion is too political. You need to get into the right project under the right team at the right time. There are some managers who are really good leaders; they will help your career path.
Intuit Edmonton has some managers or directors who are not leaders, but bosses. They are promoting much faster than developers who have done more work in the same team. Micromanagement during 1-on-1s just slows down developers' promotion.
Promotion depends on working years, but not productivity or contributions.
Switching dev teams is hard and needs political decisions based on managers' bias, which is not a product decision or by team requirements.
There are many good talents who have been "lost" these years. If you would like to keep those talents for a longer time, fairly treat each employee with transparent management and promotion. Just keep in mind, Edmonton, AB is not Mountain View, CA.
After an initial screening, I was given a coding challenge to prepare in advance of the interview. The interview itself consisted of an "about me" slideshow and then a presentation about my craft demo. I could show how I solved the problem and answer
The interview was poorly organized, with random people participating. It gave the impression of dealing with a ghost position. For example, I received an invitation to a meeting with one individual, but someone else appeared. I'm uncertain if that p
Gave me an assignment just a day before the interview was scheduled. Moreover, the interviewer didn't even ask about it in the interview. I had to take out time to do this on a workday, then it wasn't even useful. Why do this at all? The interview it
After an initial screening, I was given a coding challenge to prepare in advance of the interview. The interview itself consisted of an "about me" slideshow and then a presentation about my craft demo. I could show how I solved the problem and answer
The interview was poorly organized, with random people participating. It gave the impression of dealing with a ghost position. For example, I received an invitation to a meeting with one individual, but someone else appeared. I'm uncertain if that p
Gave me an assignment just a day before the interview was scheduled. Moreover, the interviewer didn't even ask about it in the interview. I had to take out time to do this on a workday, then it wasn't even useful. Why do this at all? The interview it