Employee-friendly policies, best place to work, organization invests in employees. Good inter-team transfer options.
The environment is too dynamic and fragile at times. Most of the projects have no roadmap, which keeps you on your toes always.
Have clarity on the project roadmap. Work on the quality of people being hired and promoted.
The interview process was brief, and I directly went to a face-to-face (f2f) meeting due to a referral. Initially, the first round focused on scripting, puzzles, and QA-related questions. The second round covered Java, including the use of anonymous
I received an employee referral. The process was quite fast, with five rounds completed in a single day. The first two rounds were technical, focusing heavily on QA-related questions and scenarios. Following those, there was a panel discussion. F
The technical process was pathetic and terrible, and not at all organized. Their recruiters need to know that they are wasting candidates' time and energy. They should review it and make sure it doesn't happen to other candidates.
The interview process was brief, and I directly went to a face-to-face (f2f) meeting due to a referral. Initially, the first round focused on scripting, puzzles, and QA-related questions. The second round covered Java, including the use of anonymous
I received an employee referral. The process was quite fast, with five rounds completed in a single day. The first two rounds were technical, focusing heavily on QA-related questions and scenarios. Following those, there was a panel discussion. F
The technical process was pathetic and terrible, and not at all organized. Their recruiters need to know that they are wasting candidates' time and energy. They should review it and make sure it doesn't happen to other candidates.