Money could not buy my soul, so it cannot be counted as a pro.
Welcome to a company that is copying all the big names but going nowhere.
Intuit is only good on paper and advertising its brand in the country. The blunt truth is, it is an absolutely hyped, mid-layer, flabby company whose quality of management leaders is as null as it can be. It is pretty much an ugly, tarred container.
All higher-ups are a grouped bunch hired from Yahoo, and they all operate in a gang. Intuit no doubt tries to buy you by paying a digit extra to your salary, but what they take back is everything you have got.
It is not at all a company where you will find work-life balance, and the reason behind that is a rather classless management.
They all follow a line laid out by their heads, and none of them actually use or even think of using their own brains, as their souls have been bought by the management by paying them CTCs that roll off the tongue.
DO NOT JOIN INTUIT and SELL YOUR LIFE... THE BENEFITS, SALARY, ETC. ARE ONLY TO SHOW YOU THE BONE... LIFE INSIDE IS PATHETIC... NO PROS.. ALL CONS..
I have worked in 3 premium product companies before this, and I can warrant by my experience that this company's management is all-time low.
All 5-star ratings are written by the management guys; the reality is worse.
Even media who sponsors them highly in India are well-paid under the table to hype their portfolio.
Do not commit the biggest mistake of your life and a career blunder.
None, not worth it.
One tech interview, one HR interview, and one on-spot design work. Questions focused on algorithms and the resume. Little about design patterns, and when and where to use them. Specifically asked about the Factory, Template, and Builder patterns.
I was told the whole process in detail, but nothing of that sort happened. It started with a coding problem, and I was asked to discuss a solution and write a program for it. After that, there was a panel of two members who asked about my current p
Round 1 was OA: 4 questions were from easy to medium difficulty with 1 hard question. Round 2 was an interview: projects and DSA. Round 3 covered DBMS and CS fundamentals. Round 4 was HR.
One tech interview, one HR interview, and one on-spot design work. Questions focused on algorithms and the resume. Little about design patterns, and when and where to use them. Specifically asked about the Factory, Template, and Builder patterns.
I was told the whole process in detail, but nothing of that sort happened. It started with a coding problem, and I was asked to discuss a solution and write a program for it. After that, there was a panel of two members who asked about my current p
Round 1 was OA: 4 questions were from easy to medium difficulty with 1 hard question. Round 2 was an interview: projects and DSA. Round 3 covered DBMS and CS fundamentals. Round 4 was HR.