The development process is incredibly slow (as are most banks). It takes forever to make a change and get things out.
They rely heavily on internal tooling and frameworks that are not transferable to the outside world, so getting a job afterward is more difficult.
Unless you're talking to a VP and up, a lot of people here aren't as competent with good development practices.
The amount of brown-nosing that happens is really annoying.
Executives are always slow to adopt necessary tools and basically fish for praise when they implement a super simple idea that has already been around in the industry for years. They are also pretty detached from the reality of everyday people.
First, a take-home coding question with a time limit. LeetCode easy, I think. After that, a three-hour session. The people I spoke to were not really talking with me and only asking minimal questions, expecting me to fill up the rest of the time talk
Got a final round interview through the Code for Good program. HR was friendly, the interviewer was okay. I answered all questions fine, but still didn't get the job. So, I'm not too sure what the selection criteria is.
The whole process has 3 rounds. The first round is a coding round conducted on the HackerRank platform. The second round was a HireView video interview, and the last round was a code for good event.
First, a take-home coding question with a time limit. LeetCode easy, I think. After that, a three-hour session. The people I spoke to were not really talking with me and only asking minimal questions, expecting me to fill up the rest of the time talk
Got a final round interview through the Code for Good program. HR was friendly, the interviewer was okay. I answered all questions fine, but still didn't get the job. So, I'm not too sure what the selection criteria is.
The whole process has 3 rounds. The first round is a coding round conducted on the HackerRank platform. The second round was a HireView video interview, and the last round was a code for good event.