Depended greatly upon the direct manager. If the manager made it so, you had chances for training, travel for presentations, book purchases, software purchases, and experimentation with new ways of doing things.
Layoffs at least twice a year to make books look good. For the employees who remained, continual reorgs and churn. You never knew who would be behind your VP's desk, or which VP you'd report to, on any given day.
Cut it out with the giant twice-yearly layoffs (plus smaller prunings at the end of the other quarters). It ruins morale.
On the other hand, good job at starting to get act together around product offerings and software direction.
organized and systematic. Covered a wide range of areas. Different interviewers focused on different aspects. Most of the sections in the resume and skill sets mentioned in the resume were covered. Interviewers went through the experience in chronolo
I was asked for a phone interview and then an on-site. The interview was not tough, but they didn't get back to me. They asked about my projects and some logic gates. The interview was easy.
Went for a test engineer position. Four interview rounds: three technical and one with a manager. Got an excellent boss and am very happy about it.
organized and systematic. Covered a wide range of areas. Different interviewers focused on different aspects. Most of the sections in the resume and skill sets mentioned in the resume were covered. Interviewers went through the experience in chronolo
I was asked for a phone interview and then an on-site. The interview was not tough, but they didn't get back to me. They asked about my projects and some logic gates. The interview was easy.
Went for a test engineer position. Four interview rounds: three technical and one with a manager. Got an excellent boss and am very happy about it.