The interview consisted of 4 stages:
The first interview was basic get-to-know-me stuff. The second interview was majorly non-technical, comprising a lot of scenario-based questions. This interview went quite well, and I got the call for the third interview quite quickly. Some questions were:
The third interview was a mixed one, technical and non-technical, though more towards the non-technical side again. There were three different QAs who evaluated me. Some questions were:
I was very hopeful about this interview too, but I came to know that one of the three people didn't approve of me. The HR was very supportive throughout the way and remained in good communication with me. They told me I aced all the tests but, somehow, they were looking for another individual for their team.
The following metrics were computed from 1 interview experience for the King QA Analyst role in Sweden.
King's interview process for their QA Analyst roles in Sweden is extremely selective, failing the vast majority of engineers.
Candidates reported having very good feelings for King's QA Analyst interview process in Sweden.