Great people at King, exciting projects, and tech, along with good benefits.
Engineering teams could be more diverse.
The interviewer was 5 minutes late, and it felt like that was a regular occurrence. She read my resume in front of me, meaning she was not prepared. I felt a bit of hubris from the recruiter, suggesting that the company is awesome. It felt off-putti
There are very good people on the judgment panel, and they normally read your CV very well before asking questions. It's a highly capable team. They mostly find negative points in your talk where they can potentially fail you. The interviewer did not
First, there is a call with HR. Then, there are two technical tests followed by "culture fit" interviews with team members. The technical tests cover theoretical programming concepts, parallelism, system management, etc.
The interviewer was 5 minutes late, and it felt like that was a regular occurrence. She read my resume in front of me, meaning she was not prepared. I felt a bit of hubris from the recruiter, suggesting that the company is awesome. It felt off-putti
There are very good people on the judgment panel, and they normally read your CV very well before asking questions. It's a highly capable team. They mostly find negative points in your talk where they can potentially fail you. The interviewer did not
First, there is a call with HR. Then, there are two technical tests followed by "culture fit" interviews with team members. The technical tests cover theoretical programming concepts, parallelism, system management, etc.