It is a relatively stable company with some intelligent engineers.
Innovation in software engineering is discouraged, to the detriment of the company and workforce.
Excessive numbers of unnecessary meetings harm progress on projects.
Listen to engineers more and call fewer meetings.
1. Interviewer doesn't understand the basics of computer science. A good coder is 100 times better than an average coder. 2. Interviewer can't see multiple solutions to the same problem. No analytical thinking. Good place to reproduce what you read
It consisted of a written test and a couple of interviews. Most of them are algo based questions. Also they have tested on programming well
Firstly there was an online coding test. Students shortlisted from this round were in for a 24 hour hackathon which was conducted the day after. For the hackathon we were given a REST API to develop with no language restrictions. We were asked to bu
1. Interviewer doesn't understand the basics of computer science. A good coder is 100 times better than an average coder. 2. Interviewer can't see multiple solutions to the same problem. No analytical thinking. Good place to reproduce what you read
It consisted of a written test and a couple of interviews. Most of them are algo based questions. Also they have tested on programming well
Firstly there was an online coding test. Students shortlisted from this round were in for a 24 hour hackathon which was conducted the day after. For the hackathon we were given a REST API to develop with no language restrictions. We were asked to bu