The product has a huge user base, but it's not a rocket science technology to replicate. Apple has been very unhappy with what Life360 is doing so far, and Apple engineers and teams are aware.
Mobile leadership is a complete let down. People of a certain race and men were favored. If you are a female engineer and have issues with these favorites, please cry inside the restroom. You would get a bad review through your manager claiming that you are very sensitive. If the favorites get aggressive and exhibit unprofessional behavior, live with it. The mobile leadership would threaten to fire the entire team for these favorites. There were instances of management secretly spying on their colleagues with their very own app features to prove how bad this favoritism exists. This might sound crazy, but yes, it did happen.
Bad engineers:
Bad acquisition:
A lot of fake reviews could be seen on Glassdoor from the HR. They hired enough people to write these fake reviews. Please be wary and do your own mindful research elsewhere before you even consider interviewing with this company. One of the very old reviews would have mentioned that engineering is a revolving door. This is quite true and painful that it still happens after 4 years.
Dear CEO, I have read all your responses to the reviews. You very much care about the profits your company makes and you certainly do not care a bit about the employees' happiness at work. Yes having a new CTO is cool but stop making it sound like that's the fix. That speaks volumes about the leadership quality. The bad apples are still around and you are aware.
Initial round with a hiring manager that happened in May 2020. A follow-up was made on the third week of July 2020. Second round of interview involved a simple coding round, and the organization hasn't had the courtesy to provide the result. Sugges
Pretty standard process: * Call with a recruiter * Interview with Eng Manager * Tech screening interview * Algorithm/Eng interview * Pair programming Everything was done with a decent pace; each following interview was scheduled within th
In the 1st phase, there were 2 interviews. One was a code challenge in Coderpad, and another was behavioural with managers. In the 2nd phase, there were 3 interviews: 2 about system design and 1 about code quality.
Initial round with a hiring manager that happened in May 2020. A follow-up was made on the third week of July 2020. Second round of interview involved a simple coding round, and the organization hasn't had the courtesy to provide the result. Sugges
Pretty standard process: * Call with a recruiter * Interview with Eng Manager * Tech screening interview * Algorithm/Eng interview * Pair programming Everything was done with a decent pace; each following interview was scheduled within th
In the 1st phase, there were 2 interviews. One was a code challenge in Coderpad, and another was behavioural with managers. In the 2nd phase, there were 3 interviews: 2 about system design and 1 about code quality.