It all depends on the manager you get here. Managers play favorites, politics is present, and engineers put forward shabby work.
Software is always breaking because everything is rushed all the time.
People are too emotionally invested at their jobs, and it gets in the way all the time. A good amount of people care too much about their egos to actually do some real good work.
The standard procedure involves a few interviews before a panel interview (HR, manager(s), coding, panel). However, there was no homogeneity in the difficulty of these interviews. I haven't had an experience thus far where there was such a discrepan
The interview process began with recruiter screening, followed by a hiring manager introduction, a coding exercise, and then a panel of four or five interviews. The interviewers and team seemed competent and warm. The interactions were positive; how
The interview consists of 3 rounds: 1. HR screening call. 2. A 1.5-hour call with the hiring manager and two senior engineers. This consists of three back-to-back half-hour calls. (Each call can have multiple people.) 3. Final round (I don't have mu
The standard procedure involves a few interviews before a panel interview (HR, manager(s), coding, panel). However, there was no homogeneity in the difficulty of these interviews. I haven't had an experience thus far where there was such a discrepan
The interview process began with recruiter screening, followed by a hiring manager introduction, a coding exercise, and then a panel of four or five interviews. The interviewers and team seemed competent and warm. The interactions were positive; how
The interview consists of 3 rounds: 1. HR screening call. 2. A 1.5-hour call with the hiring manager and two senior engineers. This consists of three back-to-back half-hour calls. (Each call can have multiple people.) 3. Final round (I don't have mu