Disappointing Experience – Strong Performance but No Offer Despite Positive Feedback
I recently interviewed for a Network Production Engineer position at Meta (London). The process included a screening round where I successfully solved both coding problems:
The first technical round covered networking fundamentals (TCP/IP, basic network topology, H-S-R-S-H communication, packet drop analysis, TCP flow control, and congestion control). I performed well in both rounds and received positive feedback from the interviewers.
However, five days later, I received a rejection email, stating they were “moving forward with other candidates.” Seeing the same position reposted on LinkedIn shortly afterward was frustrating and disheartening.
When I asked one interviewer about Meta’s work-life balance, his response felt dismissive and unprofessional, which added to the negative impression.
Advice to Management:
Please provide constructive feedback to candidates and maintain professionalism during all interactions. Transparency in the hiring process would improve candidate experience significantly.
Problem 1: Battleship problem.
Problem 2: Reading a file and finding repeated occurrences of words, along with explaining time and space complexity.
The first technical round covered networking fundamentals (TCP/IP, basic network topology, H-S-R-S-H communication, packet drop analysis, TCP flow control, and congestion control). I performed well in both rounds and received positive feedback from the interviewers.
The following metrics were computed from 2 interview experiences for the Meta Network Production Engineer role in London, United Kingdom.
Meta's interview process for their Network Production Engineer roles in London, the United Kingdom is extremely selective, failing the vast majority of engineers.
Candidates reported having very negative feelings for Meta's Network Production Engineer interview process in London, United Kingdom.