The process began with an online assessment covering networking, Linux, and coding fundamentals. This consisted of 15 multiple-choice questions (MCQs) to be completed in 16 minutes. Topics included TCP/IP, BGP, Python, and troubleshooting.
After passing, I moved on to two 45-minute technical interviews:
Coding Round: This focused on file handling, data structures, Big-O notation, and common algorithms.
Networking Round: This was scenario-based and covered optical networking, switching/routing, and L0/L1 troubleshooting.
Pros:
Cons:
Overall:
A great opportunity to demonstrate both software and deep networking skills. I would recommend preparing in-depth for both domains, especially optical layer concepts.
Walk me through how you'd troubleshoot a server that's not reachable.
What happens when you type a URL in a browser?
How does BGP work, and when would you prefer it over OSPF?
Describe a time you troubleshooted a complex network issue.
Explain how the TCP handshake works.
What's the difference between TCP and UDP?
How do you find a memory leak in a Python script?
What are common causes of high CPU usage on a Linux server?
Explain optical networking and the challenges at Layer 0/1.
How does DNS resolution work behind the scenes?
The following metrics were computed from 6 interview experiences for the Meta Network Production Engineer role in United States.
Meta's interview process for their Network Production Engineer roles in the United States is extremely selective, failing the vast majority of engineers.
Candidates reported having good feelings for Meta's Network Production Engineer interview process in United States.