I joined Meta from Google, and in a lot of ways they are similar.
Both companies are very engineering-centric.
What I like about Meta is that it is more dynamic, and things get done faster. It is still a good idea to have a design document, but only to achieve alignment with your peers faster and unblock you. If there is no controversy about your idea, you can just go ahead and code it.
This environment of "move fast" creates a lot of pressure due to high expectations.
Lack of boundaries between teams creates a very competitive environment. If you don't work on an opportunity within your area of responsibility, someone else will, and soon.
They were very nice. First, I was contacted by a girl who said she would pass my C.V. on. Afterwards, a guy who was in the same field area as me interviewed me. All interaction was on the phone.
The phone interview included: * Two medium LeetCode-style questions. * An introduction at the beginning. * A few minutes at the end for questions. The interview was very helpful and guided me towards the most optimal solution.
I have about 6 years of work experience as a software engineer. A sourcer reached out to me via email inviting me to apply, followed by a call with a recruiter. The interviews consisted of: * One technical phone screen (coding) * An onsite roun
They were very nice. First, I was contacted by a girl who said she would pass my C.V. on. Afterwards, a guy who was in the same field area as me interviewed me. All interaction was on the phone.
The phone interview included: * Two medium LeetCode-style questions. * An introduction at the beginning. * A few minutes at the end for questions. The interview was very helpful and guided me towards the most optimal solution.
I have about 6 years of work experience as a software engineer. A sourcer reached out to me via email inviting me to apply, followed by a call with a recruiter. The interviews consisted of: * One technical phone screen (coding) * An onsite roun