Pros: Microsoft has great pay and awesome benefits. There are plenty of opportunities to move around within the company when it is time to try something new.

Cons: Sometimes it seems there is a lot of bureaucracy and questionable decisions made by upper management, depending on the organization.

Pros: Broad range of internal positions available. Easy to move between teams and take up new challenges. Good employee benefits. Organization cares for the professional growth of employees.

Cons: Work-life balance takes a hit. The performance policy has changed, and there is uncertainty in the present. Hopefully, this will change by the end of 2014.

Pros: There are lots of bright people working at MS. There is so much you can learn from others, and you can generally count on the competence of your co-workers. The benefits are amazing, by far the best I have ever heard of. If you have a family, this is great. The company is stable. Not much chance of it going out of business, leaving you without a job. There is a lot of support for MS in the Redmond area. There are many perks, like the PRIME card given to all employees, which grants you access to huge discounts on many local products and services. You can go anywhere in the world and say you work for Microsoft, and people will know what you are talking about. You get significant time off. Work/life balance is respected. Microsoft does a lot of things. If you want a change, you can always look elsewhere within the company. * Free soda, milk, etc., at work * Individual offices * A huge, beautiful campus * Internal interest groups for just about anything you enjoy doing * A diverse, cosmopolitan workforce * Support for telecommuting, although generally you will lose productivity when doing so

Cons: The company is too large, and there is too much inertia associated with heavyweight processes and legacy maintenance. This makes the company slow to react and change directions. There is a huge amount of competition at MS. The few who shine brightest are rewarded well, but career advancement for the rest is a problem, even though in most other companies they would be stars. Moving within the company involves a tough interview process. While there is grass-roots support for agile processes, management is clinging on to heavyweight processes for dear life. The company as a whole is viewed negatively from the outside. This gets frustrating. Innovation is talked about a lot but rarely seen or actually encouraged. You have to wonder sometimes how certain senior executives have managed to hold on to their jobs after bungling it so many times. The review system inherently rewards individual stars rather than team players. Compensation is fairly average.