Good brand for the CV. Very well resourced. Excellent product documentation. Good exposure to future products and technologies. Good support for developers.
Poorly thought-out, over-engineered products. Proprietary technology. Closed (Microsoft-only) mind-set (despite claims to the contrary). Low barriers to entry, high barriers to exit. Bloated, self-serving middle-management. Apparent annual routine cull of 10% of the workforce.
I know you're wedded to your comfortable salaries, etc., and you have to protect that by bullying your direct reports. But know that the machine could turn on you too, and most of you are unemployable outside a Microsoft environment. So a bit of humanity towards the people who justify your positions would go a long way.
Fifteen years ago, I was an undergraduate in the top 10% of my class at a top-five American CS school. The campus recruiter would not give me the opportunity to interview for an SDE job. Instead, I was delegated to applying for QA in Test or Design,
The standard interview process consists of a short phone screen with the recruiter, followed by a panel interview a week later. It includes a few technical questions along with a few behavioral questions.
I had an initial phone screen with a recruiter. This was followed by a call from HR, and then a semi-technical phone interview. I proceeded to the onsite interviews, which lasted four hours. The interviews were conducted by one technical CSA, but pr
Fifteen years ago, I was an undergraduate in the top 10% of my class at a top-five American CS school. The campus recruiter would not give me the opportunity to interview for an SDE job. Instead, I was delegated to applying for QA in Test or Design,
The standard interview process consists of a short phone screen with the recruiter, followed by a panel interview a week later. It includes a few technical questions along with a few behavioral questions.
I had an initial phone screen with a recruiter. This was followed by a call from HR, and then a semi-technical phone interview. I proceeded to the onsite interviews, which lasted four hours. The interviews were conducted by one technical CSA, but pr