Company stability, education and certification support, and a relatively good work/life balance in mature teams.
Terrible managers around (not all, but a higher index of really bad managers than any other place before), slow growth for experienced industry hires.
Eliminate the ranking system. Use a competency-based performance evaluation that doesn't assume 10% of bad performers. Instead of improving the company, it creates the trend for 50% to focus on politics and "perform well," while creating +30% underperformers.
I was very impressed with the efficiency of the hiring process. After submitting my resume on Microsoft.com/jobs, I did not hear from the team I applied to. But within a week, I was contacted by a different team about a job that was a better fit. T
HR will arrange the whole process. It really depends on the team. But mostly, multiple people will interview you, and there will be a senior person at the end to decide whether to make an offer. For an SDET leader, they mostly look for leadership a
My first communications with Microsoft were during campus recruiting. I attended their events, primarily because I was interested in the company and the advice they offered, not because I was initially set on an internship with them (though I ended u
I was very impressed with the efficiency of the hiring process. After submitting my resume on Microsoft.com/jobs, I did not hear from the team I applied to. But within a week, I was contacted by a different team about a job that was a better fit. T
HR will arrange the whole process. It really depends on the team. But mostly, multiple people will interview you, and there will be a senior person at the end to decide whether to make an offer. For an SDET leader, they mostly look for leadership a
My first communications with Microsoft were during campus recruiting. I attended their events, primarily because I was interested in the company and the advice they offered, not because I was initially set on an internship with them (though I ended u