Get to work on high-impact products with really smart people. There is a lot of professional development support available.
Lots of training, a well-equipped training facility, and smart people to learn from.
Lack of time to take the said training.
Your entire year revolves around performance reviews. You think about reviews all the time. You get done with an annual review, and it is suddenly time to set commitments for next year. Before you know it, it is time for a mid-year review and updating those commitments, and then it is annual review again.
In between, you have to fill out other forms related to ladder level and what not. All the time you spend on this is time spent away from doing real work.
Too many meetings.
Too many lousy managers.
Too much focus on visibility and such, not enough focus on your technical abilities. Who you know counts far more than what you know.
Get rid of bad management. Tone down the amount of time spent on reviews and review-related busywork. Allow technical people to grow on a technical ladder without all this nonsense related to visibility and cross-group collaboration. Don't make the manager solely responsible for an employee's performance review. This allows a bad manager to destroy the career of many an employee.
The process was very long and time-consuming, and I did not get the job. I was very disappointed. Maybe next time they will hire. They were nice, but the process was still very long and time-consuming. I would not go through it again.
Reached out by a recruiter after applying through the careers page. The first call was with the team; there were no introductions, and we went straight to a coding question. Very little detail was given, and I had to ask questions to get clarity.
Process is split in four interviews, each for different domains. The interviewers were all good/professional and the process is streamlined. But the in-between review and feedback is nonexistent. A lot of different interlocutors makes it hard to trac
The process was very long and time-consuming, and I did not get the job. I was very disappointed. Maybe next time they will hire. They were nice, but the process was still very long and time-consuming. I would not go through it again.
Reached out by a recruiter after applying through the careers page. The first call was with the team; there were no introductions, and we went straight to a coding question. Very little detail was given, and I had to ask questions to get clarity.
Process is split in four interviews, each for different domains. The interviewers were all good/professional and the process is streamlined. But the in-between review and feedback is nonexistent. A lot of different interlocutors makes it hard to trac