Technically very inspiring.
Great focus on individual contributors.
Great professionalism in keeping solutions simple.
Great principle of ship it fast, improve it fast.
Disrespectful treatment of employees as an expense.
Massive dishonesty and hypocrisy in the review process.
Use the review solely as a base for bonuses, but do not block people from switching positions when their manager takes a dislike to them.
Phone screen: Design Questions 1st Interview: OOPs 2nd Interview: Binary Tree and Palindrome 3rd Interview: String traversal 4th Interview (Hiring Manager): Meeting booking Topics: * Design an elevator * OOPs concepts with an example * Data Stru
Very straightforward, two back-to-back thirty-minute technical interviews that had a combination of LeetCode easy and medium questions, along with some behavioral questions that were sprinkled in there.
It was one round, two interviews: one technical and one behavioral. It took about a month to get the interview request and a week to hear back. The behavioral round also had some minimal technical questions.
Phone screen: Design Questions 1st Interview: OOPs 2nd Interview: Binary Tree and Palindrome 3rd Interview: String traversal 4th Interview (Hiring Manager): Meeting booking Topics: * Design an elevator * OOPs concepts with an example * Data Stru
Very straightforward, two back-to-back thirty-minute technical interviews that had a combination of LeetCode easy and medium questions, along with some behavioral questions that were sprinkled in there.
It was one round, two interviews: one technical and one behavioral. It took about a month to get the interview request and a week to hear back. The behavioral round also had some minimal technical questions.