Microsoft is still a very powerful company. There are jobs and software it creates for just about everything. You feel like the company cares about you, far more than free soda. They have training classes on everything you could think of, and for those who manage to get themselves into the good graces of management who likes them, the sky is the limit. There are still good jobs at Microsoft, but it's hard to find them.
There is a strong tradition of failing upwards. The company has lost a lot of its best and brightest to other companies, and the bottom-feeders that are left tend to be very bad at their jobs.
The company's biggest problem is how political it is. You will never get a promotion on the merits of the job you do; you must get into the "inner circle" of a higher-up manager to have any chance.
Most of the time, instead of dealing with the politics, people just get fed up and leave -- and forever after have nightmares about their experience.
The company has a mandate to fire 7% of their employees a year, and if you aren't in the top-tier inner circle, you feel like you're always fighting for your job. Every promotion you get is one that someone else did not.
Avoid the Office division like the plague; it is the least innovative part of the company. The technical stagnation of "It's been done this way for years, and we'll continue to do it this way" permeates every part of the product. You will not grow or learn there.
For some, it's OK because they have a relatively high paying job that doesn't expect much of them. But I wanted more.
Get rid of HiPo, The Bench, 1+.
Or, if you decide to keep them, tell employees they exist. Explain who is and is not on them, and what the criteria for them are.
Listen to your employees and focus on making good managers, versus managers who are good at managing up.
Do something to fight attrition, and make it easier for employees to move between divisions of the company.
Invest in technical competence and be less results-driven.
Be a technology company that happens to need to make money, versus a business that happens to be a technology company.
After sending my resume, I was contacted by an HR representative to schedule an initial phone interview to go through my resume. After an hour's talk, she sent me another email to schedule a technical interview. It took about two weeks until the pho
I had an on-campus interview where the interviewer asked questions about a couple of things on my resume, as well as the most challenging technical problem I've faced and how I solved it. I was not asked any coding questions. Two months went by befo
Smooth and simple. Everyone was very polite, and HR was easy to communicate with. I'd do it all over again in a heartbeat. On-site also went decently well (although I've heard horror stories from others). Interviewees had plenty of perks to help th
After sending my resume, I was contacted by an HR representative to schedule an initial phone interview to go through my resume. After an hour's talk, she sent me another email to schedule a technical interview. It took about two weeks until the pho
I had an on-campus interview where the interviewer asked questions about a couple of things on my resume, as well as the most challenging technical problem I've faced and how I solved it. I was not asked any coding questions. Two months went by befo
Smooth and simple. Everyone was very polite, and HR was easy to communicate with. I'd do it all over again in a heartbeat. On-site also went decently well (although I've heard horror stories from others). Interviewees had plenty of perks to help th