How about getting input from the employees before making stupid choices, like no offices for almost everyone? What about asking for feedback on big bets instead of revealing them long after the decisions have been etched in stone and are too late to change?
I mean, really, getting rid of the Start button? For crying out loud!
Look way into the future and come up with something that will actually work and move the stock in a positive direction. Get rid of the completely broken review system.
Microsoft's infamous "interview loop" consists of three one-hour-ish interviews with current MSFT employees, followed by another interview with a general manager. The interview structure is nothing peculiar, featuring standard algorithm construction
I had an onsite interview with MS in February 2016. The interview started at 1:00 PM and lasted several hours. I met with four interviewers and had a 10-minute break with free snacks and drinks between each session. Every interviewer followed a sim
I was contacted by a recruiter for a hiring event organized by one of the groups at Microsoft. Overall, it was a very smooth interview experience. First, I was asked to complete a 1-hour online test, and following that, I attended an onsite event.
Microsoft's infamous "interview loop" consists of three one-hour-ish interviews with current MSFT employees, followed by another interview with a general manager. The interview structure is nothing peculiar, featuring standard algorithm construction
I had an onsite interview with MS in February 2016. The interview started at 1:00 PM and lasted several hours. I met with four interviewers and had a 10-minute break with free snacks and drinks between each session. Every interviewer followed a sim
I was contacted by a recruiter for a hiring event organized by one of the groups at Microsoft. Overall, it was a very smooth interview experience. First, I was asked to complete a 1-hour online test, and following that, I attended an onsite event.