Reasonable work-life balance, enjoyable work environment
Reasonable work-life balance, enjoyable work environment
Salary competitive, benefits A-grade, reasonable work-life balance, good work environment, supportive team members for your learning, leading tech projects.
Not having the agility and atmosphere of small companies and startups. Sometimes have to stay on call 24 hours and might be called during the night.
Was this helpful?
Microsoft Interview Questions
Microsoft Interview Experiences
Software Development Engineer
I interviewed with two engineers and whiteboard-coded with both. I also spoke with the direct manager and discussed the goals and details of the current project. The first interview involved coding in SQL, and the second involved coding in Java to so
Software Development Engineer
The onsite interview is a really good experience. I learned a lot through the interview process. It was not hard. People there are really nice and friendly. They are really ready to help you and make you very comfortable.
Software Development Engineer
There was an initial phone interview, followed by an on-site interview. The on-site interview was in three parts, each increasing in difficulty: 1. Basic introduction and a simple problem. 2. Question related to the group's work. 3. A design questi
Software Development Engineer
Redmond, Washington, United StatesDecember 1, 2014I interviewed with two engineers and whiteboard-coded with both. I also spoke with the direct manager and discussed the goals and details of the current project. The first interview involved coding in SQL, and the second involved coding in Java to so
Software Development Engineer
Redmond, Washington, United StatesOctober 1, 2015The onsite interview is a really good experience. I learned a lot through the interview process. It was not hard. People there are really nice and friendly. They are really ready to help you and make you very comfortable.
Software Development Engineer
Redmond, Washington, United StatesMay 1, 2015There was an initial phone interview, followed by an on-site interview. The on-site interview was in three parts, each increasing in difficulty: 1. Basic introduction and a simple problem. 2. Question related to the group's work. 3. A design questi
