Tons of interesting projects and smart people to work with.
Tons of overhead on paperwork and poor tooling.
1. Technical screening with hiring manager 2. Onsite (6 hours, including 30-minute lunch) with managers and engineers. Arrogant and short-tempered managers. Never heard from the recruiter, even after following up and requesting feedback. Never expe
Hard, not too easy. They gave plenty of time to solve the code, but I just wasn't too confident. In hindsight, I should have been better prepared. But I still would've screwed it up.
The recruiter sent me a wrong link for the interview, which I obtained through a referral from an old coworker. Consequently, the schedule was delayed. Later, we discovered the recruiter was using the wrong job posting. Finally, the interview was sc
1. Technical screening with hiring manager 2. Onsite (6 hours, including 30-minute lunch) with managers and engineers. Arrogant and short-tempered managers. Never heard from the recruiter, even after following up and requesting feedback. Never expe
Hard, not too easy. They gave plenty of time to solve the code, but I just wasn't too confident. In hindsight, I should have been better prepared. But I still would've screwed it up.
The recruiter sent me a wrong link for the interview, which I obtained through a referral from an old coworker. Consequently, the schedule was delayed. Later, we discovered the recruiter was using the wrong job posting. Finally, the interview was sc