Taro Logo

Should be a 4.5-star company

Software Engineer
Current Employee
Has worked at NetApp for 6 years
June 27, 2015
Research Triangle Park, North Carolina
3.0
Doesn't RecommendPositive OutlookNo CEO Opinion
Pros

Great technology (actually unbelievable software) Good engineers Good management remain Weekly beer bash (in RTP anyway)

Cons

Engineers are considered commodity items.

Engineering productivity is completely discounted.

We are losing way too many good engineers.

The board of directors is determined to drive the company into the dirt.

Bad management cancer is limiting career opportunities.

Bad management cancer is spreading (metric Nazis - see above).

Advice to Management

I have to believe the board is destroying this company (of course, there's no way I can possibly know for sure). I do know NetApp keeps looking for cheaper ways to replace good engineering talent, and it's not working. The board's vision is this: a highly paid management and sales organization, and out-sourced everything else. Obviously, this is not going to work.

Tom Georgens was a good man who was not "sexy" enough for the board, so they dumped him. Yes, there were problems recently. But things will improve, and now the wrong person will get credit (sad).

My advice: fire the board of directors (I know this is not possible) and replace them with some progressive innovators who are not scared of "activist investors". Shift your spending priorities from retaining good management to retaining good engineers. Invest more in engineering productivity. Encourage your good existing engineers to develop new skills instead of replacing them with new hires. This will greatly improve employee loyalty.

Was this helpful?

NetApp Interview Experiences