Transparency, little process, and the ability to influence technical decisions.
As the company grows, the startup-like culture is fading. There's a lack of technical hierarchy, and a big influx of newish engineers is leading to chaos.
'Virtual onsite' in the US: * Hectic interviewing process, including a last-minute change of the interview topic and logistical issues like the recruiting coordinator calling during an ongoing interview. I wonder if it reflects the chaos within the
Overall, it's very good. The interviewers are nice and knowledgeable. There are three senior developers, each with a different focus: * One general interview covering your background and depth of interested areas. * One review of the take-home
The interview process is unnecessarily long and convoluted. This company doesn’t seem to know who it wants to hire, thus wasting candidates’ time. It starts with an intensive recruiter screen, where the recruiter acts as if they are the hiring manag
'Virtual onsite' in the US: * Hectic interviewing process, including a last-minute change of the interview topic and logistical issues like the recruiting coordinator calling during an ongoing interview. I wonder if it reflects the chaos within the
Overall, it's very good. The interviewers are nice and knowledgeable. There are three senior developers, each with a different focus: * One general interview covering your background and depth of interested areas. * One review of the take-home
The interview process is unnecessarily long and convoluted. This company doesn’t seem to know who it wants to hire, thus wasting candidates’ time. It starts with an intensive recruiter screen, where the recruiter acts as if they are the hiring manag