Process
I was referred by a friend that thought I would be perfect for the role.
The internal recruiter contacted me by email and included an article for background information about the company.
The phone screen was scheduled for 30 minutes.
I felt the interviewer was unprepared and all questions were posed as just requiring a simple yes/no response. No questions about my resume, which led me to believe it wasn't even reviewed.
Overall, the interview felt like a waste of time.
Questions
Nothing relevant that would help others.
Was this helpful?
Interview Statistics
The following metrics were computed from 8 interview experiences for the Neuralink Mechanical Engineer role in United States.
Success Rate
Neuralink's interview process for their Mechanical Engineer roles in the United States is extremely selective, failing the vast majority of engineers.
Experience Rating
Candidates reported having good feelings for Neuralink's Mechanical Engineer interview process in United States.
Neuralink Work Experiences
- 5.0New era of Neuralink is incredibleMechanical Engineer • Current EmployeeJanuary 26, 2023Pros: - Some of the smartest people in the world - Everyone is extremely kind, with virtually no jerks - A culture that is very focused around helping people - Everyone who cares a lot about how the animals are treated and where there is a ton of transparency around this and everything elseCons: - Long hours and high intensity - Salary that is not top of the line vs. what you'd expect with how selective hiring is - Lots of misleading slander in the press that gets frustrating
- 3.0Work cultureMechanical Engineer • Former EmployeeFremont, CASeptember 21, 2026Pros: Overall, lots of work on exciting stuff.Cons: Overtime work and working on weekends
- 4.0Challenging Work with Great PeopleMechanical Engineer • Current EmployeeFremont, CAMay 28, 2025Pros: - Challenging work on important problems - Creative freedom to be a mad scientist - Fulfilling work with lots of incentive (if you want to help improve the lives of others) - Lots of project ownershipCons: * Very demanding workload, which can make work-life balance difficult. Not inherently a bad thing if you want to dive into your work, but not for everyone. * There could be more senior engineering guidance for more junior engineers. Trial by fire is great, but it would be great to bring in more experience from outside of the company to provide new insights.
