I applied through an employee referral. The interview was telephonic and conducted on a live code editor.

Since the live coding session lasted for an hour, I had to take a half-day leave. It turned out to be a complete waste of time and effort because the interviewer focused primarily on hard-core programming/developer questions.

He was not even interested in the logic applied for solving the questions, even when I was able to partially solve them. All he did was ask me to run the code, and if it didn't produce the desired output, he wouldn't bother asking about the logic. This reminded me of my college days when instructors solely focused on the output, regardless of the logic or data structures used.

As a Build & Release Engineer with over 7 years of experience, in addition to daily automation scripts in Perl/Shell, a Build & Release Engineer hardly gets less than 20% of their time to work on developing new tools.

If Nutanix intends to hire developers or software engineers for a Build & Release Engineer profile, they should clearly state this in the job description.

1. Print all words and occurrences which are made from the same letters from the given list: cat, atc, tac, dig, gid, abc, pqr. For example:

• cat, tac, atc are made from the same letters, so the output should be cat: 3
• dig: 2

1. Find the range of consecutive numbers out of the given numbers. Input: -10, -2, 0, -9, -1, 6, 1, 2, 8 Output: [-10:-9], [-2:-1], [0:2], [6], [8]