Very interesting work.
People are upfront about their mistakes.
Work with a lot of smart people.
$5 subsidy for dinner.
No work-life balance. You're stuck if your manager is bad. Unrealistic deadlines.
Please start 360-degree reviews!
The interview process was okay. The process took an abnormally long time. The interviews were interesting and a good experience. They focused mainly on C.
A 1.5-month-long process. Three phone screens (30-45 minutes each): * Phone interview 1 with the manager: Resume review, understanding interests, and abstract technical discussions about academic projects. * Phone interview 2 (Technical): Three
I applied for a few positions via their careers website and also had an employee refer me. Their process seemed pretty slow initially. However, I had two phone screens first and was called on-site to their Santa Clara HQ. I then had six rounds of tec
The interview process was okay. The process took an abnormally long time. The interviews were interesting and a good experience. They focused mainly on C.
A 1.5-month-long process. Three phone screens (30-45 minutes each): * Phone interview 1 with the manager: Resume review, understanding interests, and abstract technical discussions about academic projects. * Phone interview 2 (Technical): Three
I applied for a few positions via their careers website and also had an employee refer me. Their process seemed pretty slow initially. However, I had two phone screens first and was called on-site to their Santa Clara HQ. I then had six rounds of tec