Free breakfast and lunch, awesome barista. Great office building located in the heart of the Sydney financial district.
Penty of nice perks, e.g. gym membership, company trip, social events.
Profit sharing can mean overall remuneration can be high (although unpredictable) if you're a senior.
Work-life balance is decent. 9/10 hour days are the norm.
The company has changed over the last 12 months. Lots of amazing talent (both technical and leadership) has left over the last two-thirds of 2017.
Slow to pick up modern development practices and technologies.
Below market rate base salary ('compensated' by a discretionary profit sharing scheme that can be taken away at any time).
Upper management is opaque, and decision-making by middle management often appears to be motivated by what's best for their careers rather than what's best for the company or their team.
The level of ego among many of the technical specialists can be extreme at times. They're the best of the best, and they're not humble about it.
Personal performance appraisal is directly linked to compensation. Which sounds great in theory, but the performance appraisal process is opaque. It appears to be heavily based on how much your direct manager is willing to 'champion' your cause when individuals are ranked among all teams.
A big part of the problem is technical experts who have entered management roles due to time at the company rather than actual management skills. That's a great place to start in order to steer the Optiver experience back to its former glory.
I spoke with an engineer in Austin regarding the expansion of their New York office and equities trading. He spent most of the time asking about my work history and technical questions. He allocated about 10 minutes at the end for a fairly simple c
Highly negative experience, quite negative. I applied online and they performed resume screening. Then, they sent a HackerRank OA with medium-difficulty questions. As a good programmer, I cleared it. After that, they scheduled a short 20-minute HR
Initially, I received a HackerRank link for an online assessment round, which contained two easy questions. After two to three days, I got an email from the recruiter for a general discussion about salary expectations. Following that, a virtual ons
I spoke with an engineer in Austin regarding the expansion of their New York office and equities trading. He spent most of the time asking about my work history and technical questions. He allocated about 10 minutes at the end for a fairly simple c
Highly negative experience, quite negative. I applied online and they performed resume screening. Then, they sent a HackerRank OA with medium-difficulty questions. As a good programmer, I cleared it. After that, they scheduled a short 20-minute HR
Initially, I received a HackerRank link for an online assessment round, which contained two easy questions. After two to three days, I got an email from the recruiter for a general discussion about salary expectations. Following that, a virtual ons