Since it's all around finances and banking, priorities are always changing. You need to fight for time on maintenance and tech debt. Comments in code review quite often are replied like, "I agree with you but no time to invest into that improvement."
The very fast pace and constant context switching not only take your energy but also make it harder to plan, design, and see the bigger picture. But, as I see, this depends more on the specific team.
Many steps: * Recruiter call: Talk about your experience with a recruiter. * Pairing session: Use a service API with authentication to display data in a React component. * FE system design: Suggest product features and design APIs that will ma
Rejected for the third round. 1. Screening interview (salary expectations, information about the next interviews, and some JavaScript questions). 2. LeetCode similar questions (three questions). I passed two questions. 3. React-related question li
Submitted CV via LinkedIn. Screening call. Home test. Invested a week to do the React widget they requested, with 98% code coverage. After a week, I got an email saying I didn't match their criteria. Well, if someone invests time in your tests and
Many steps: * Recruiter call: Talk about your experience with a recruiter. * Pairing session: Use a service API with authentication to display data in a React component. * FE system design: Suggest product features and design APIs that will ma
Rejected for the third round. 1. Screening interview (salary expectations, information about the next interviews, and some JavaScript questions). 2. LeetCode similar questions (three questions). I passed two questions. 3. React-related question li
Submitted CV via LinkedIn. Screening call. Home test. Invested a week to do the React widget they requested, with 98% code coverage. After a week, I got an email saying I didn't match their criteria. Well, if someone invests time in your tests and