Rippling's primary strategic approach is to essentially be the AWS of business enablement and build a suite of HR, payroll, insurance, device management, contractor management, employee management, corporate credit card, expense reporting, and various other fintech tools that can each help every other product grow.
I was skeptical about this at first, but after seeing first-hand Rippling's tremendous advantage in being able to underwrite corporate credit cards to customers that our competitors lack the data to comfortably support, I am seeing proof of the success and acumen of Rippling's alternative approach.
Because of this unique approach, we are in the fortunate position of being one of very few tech SaaS startups that are not only not doing any layoffs but are still actively growing and hiring out more employees.
I was fortunate to have the opportunity to hire out a brand new team to prevent Financial Risk and Fraud on the Rippling platform. This is a very unique role both due to being able to build out a team from scratch and also due to Risk being a fundamentally unique aspect of engineering.
We are able to move very quickly and accomplish a lot of great work without the heavy load of bureaucratic hindrances that are more common at larger organizations.
And although I cannot speak for the experience on other teams, work-life balance on my team has been stellar despite the fast-paced nature of our work.
Since I've built out my team about a year ago, I have not had a single time where I had to stay late-nights or weekends, nor have I ever had the need to pressure my team to work any harder.
My team has been fortunate enough to run fast despite working very reasonable hours.
The interview started with a coding round, followed by a behavioral assessment. After that, they switched and informed me that the interview was now for an IC (Individual Contributor) role, rather than a manager position. This was surprising, confusi
The initial meeting with the recruiter and hiring manager was reasonable. The technical screen that followed was a complete mess. The interviewer was late, didn't know who I was, didn't know what the role entailed, and was generally disengaged. At
The first round was a recruiter screening. During this round, the company, its products, and business were presented. Essentially, the goal was to sell the company to the interviewee. The next round was a hiring manager screening. This round involve
The interview started with a coding round, followed by a behavioral assessment. After that, they switched and informed me that the interview was now for an IC (Individual Contributor) role, rather than a manager position. This was surprising, confusi
The initial meeting with the recruiter and hiring manager was reasonable. The technical screen that followed was a complete mess. The interviewer was late, didn't know who I was, didn't know what the role entailed, and was generally disengaged. At
The first round was a recruiter screening. During this round, the company, its products, and business were presented. Essentially, the goal was to sell the company to the interviewee. The next round was a hiring manager screening. This round involve