Good perks. Respectable retirement package/contribution. Relatively good technologies. Relatively good pay. Uses SCRUM/AGILE.
Constantly broken builds every day.
Too much shifting of responsibilities, people trying to pass on work to others.
Management is too stern; doesn't take people's experience into account.
Spent too much time training junior engineers.
Lots of meetings.
The hiring process was straightforward and well-organized. Communication was clear, and interviewers were professional and friendly. Each stage had a defined purpose, and timelines were respected. Overall, it provided a positive candidate experien
Had two rounds of phone interviews covering basic Object-Oriented Programming (OOP) concepts and testing-related questions. Candidates were asked to devise test cases for the following scenarios: * Reverse a string * Quick sort * Shortest path
Good and very insightful. Well-behaved employees, straight-to-the-point questions. Nice office with good salary options and benefits included. The staff were very well-behaved and demonstrated good communication skills. Felt cozy while making the
The hiring process was straightforward and well-organized. Communication was clear, and interviewers were professional and friendly. Each stage had a defined purpose, and timelines were respected. Overall, it provided a positive candidate experien
Had two rounds of phone interviews covering basic Object-Oriented Programming (OOP) concepts and testing-related questions. Candidates were asked to devise test cases for the following scenarios: * Reverse a string * Quick sort * Shortest path
Good and very insightful. Well-behaved employees, straight-to-the-point questions. Nice office with good salary options and benefits included. The staff were very well-behaved and demonstrated good communication skills. Felt cozy while making the