ServiceTitan

Staff Software Engineer Interview Experience - Kyle, Texas

July 5, 2026

Positive ExperienceNo Offer

Process

I applied through a recruiter. The process took 6 weeks.

Very challenging:

Initial screening
2 coding interviews
One systems design interview

Everybody was great throughout the process, and they clearly have a great culture, but I happened to be on the tail end of a hiring cycle so I got no offer.

Questions

Design a messenger application similar to Telegram

Was this helpful?

Interview Statistics

The following metrics were computed from 1 interview experience for the ServiceTitan Staff Software Engineer role in Kyle, Texas.

Success Rate

0%

Pass Rate

ServiceTitan's interview process for their Staff Software Engineer roles in Kyle, Texas is extremely selective, failing the vast majority of engineers.

Experience Rating

Positive100%

Neutral0%

Negative0%

Candidates reported having very good feelings for ServiceTitan's Staff Software Engineer interview process in Kyle, Texas.

ServiceTitan Work Experiences

Good work-life balance, but leadership uncertainty persists

Staff Software Engineer • Current Employee

Pros: Good WLB and decent pay.

Cons: Leadership has changed, and no one knows what's going on.

Good work-life balance, but leadership uncertainty persists

Staff Software Engineer • Current Employee

Pros: Good WLB and decent pay.

Cons: Leadership has changed, and no one knows what's going on.

Very solid company with usual issues of big enterprise

Staff Software Engineer • Current Employee

Yerevan, Yerevan

Pros: International company, good compensation, and great medical insurance.

Cons: A lot of legacy stuff, and timezone differences might be a pain.

Very solid company with usual issues of big enterprise

Staff Software Engineer • Current Employee

Yerevan, Yerevan

Pros: International company, good compensation, and great medical insurance.

Cons: A lot of legacy stuff, and timezone differences might be a pain.

Dated practices but decent comp

Staff Software Engineer • Current Employee

Pros: Overall comp package is pretty decent, featuring a salary, bonus, RSUs with annual performance-based grants, a 401(k), benefits, and lots of time off.

Cons: Lack of mature processes and modern practices, which is slowly changing

Dated practices but decent comp

Staff Software Engineer • Current Employee

Pros: Overall comp package is pretty decent, featuring a salary, bonus, RSUs with annual performance-based grants, a 401(k), benefits, and lots of time off.

Cons: Lack of mature processes and modern practices, which is slowly changing

Good work-life balance, but leadership uncertainty persists

Staff Software Engineer • Current Employee

Pros: Good WLB and decent pay.

Cons: Leadership has changed, and no one knows what's going on.

4.0
Good work-life balance, but leadership uncertainty persists
Staff Software Engineer • Current Employee
Glendale, CA
July 17, 2026
Pros: Good WLB and decent pay.
Cons: Leadership has changed, and no one knows what's going on.

Very solid company with usual issues of big enterprise

Staff Software Engineer • Current Employee

Yerevan, Yerevan

Pros: International company, good compensation, and great medical insurance.

Cons: A lot of legacy stuff, and timezone differences might be a pain.

4.0
Very solid company with usual issues of big enterprise
Staff Software Engineer • Current Employee
Yerevan, Yerevan
June 19, 2025
Pros: International company, good compensation, and great medical insurance.
Cons: A lot of legacy stuff, and timezone differences might be a pain.

Dated practices but decent comp

Staff Software Engineer • Current Employee

Pros: Overall comp package is pretty decent, featuring a salary, bonus, RSUs with annual performance-based grants, a 401(k), benefits, and lots of time off.

Cons: Lack of mature processes and modern practices, which is slowly changing

2.0
Dated practices but decent comp
Staff Software Engineer • Current Employee
Glendale, CA
July 31, 2023
Pros: Overall comp package is pretty decent, featuring a salary, bonus, RSUs with annual performance-based grants, a 401(k), benefits, and lots of time off.
Cons: Lack of mature processes and modern practices, which is slowly changing

Copyright © Taro