Engineers are generally good people.
The senior leadership team is so far removed from reality. They treat projects that they don't understand or care about as "side-quests" that need to be dropped. Their performance review process is largely undefined, like making jello to another pile of jello. There is plenty of wording in place to deny advancement.
Care. Treat your employees like the humans they are.
Overall, I had 4 interviews. The first 3 were with people from both technical and HR departments. They were very nice and mostly discussed my development experience and life story. I believe they were quite interested in what I have been doing and a
- 30-minute initial generic recruitment call. This one went well; the recruiter was really likeable. - 1-hour 'life story' call. I found this to be more of an interrogation than sharing. The session felt like they didn't actually want to know more a
1-hour technical screen, 1-hour life story. The technical screen took 15 minutes. It was a super easy question that I solved quickly. I then progressed to the life story, which is an interview with a recruiter where you basically talk about your exp
Overall, I had 4 interviews. The first 3 were with people from both technical and HR departments. They were very nice and mostly discussed my development experience and life story. I believe they were quite interested in what I have been doing and a
- 30-minute initial generic recruitment call. This one went well; the recruiter was really likeable. - 1-hour 'life story' call. I found this to be more of an interrogation than sharing. The session felt like they didn't actually want to know more a
1-hour technical screen, 1-hour life story. The technical screen took 15 minutes. It was a super easy question that I solved quickly. I then progressed to the life story, which is an interview with a recruiter where you basically talk about your exp