After an initial phone screen with an internal recruiter, who was nice, I was initially excited about the company.
I talked with a manager three or four days later, then was assigned a '2hr' take-home assignment.
First of all, the 2-hour time expectation is a joke. Even someone with more experience than me would have spent a few days on it.
In the take-home, one of the tasks was to do something that wasn't even possible given a blocking issue. I asked for feedback about this and did not get any, even after a week. As I've read in other interview reviews, my experience was that Slack is disrespectful to candidates.
When many people have the same experience interviewing with a company, they should really pay attention and make changes. Slack hasn't done this.
After turning in the take-home, I got a rejection notice which also did not address the earlier issue.
Advice to applying candidates?
Interviewing itself is a job, and no one should be expected to spend a large chunk of time on an assignment when they're interviewing at many other places.
Needless to say, I had a sour experience and would not apply at Slack again.
The take-home was the hardest part; the rest was typical.
What was a project you feel proud of?
The following metrics were computed from 1 interview experience for the Slack Build and Release Engineer role in United States.
Slack's interview process for their Build and Release Engineer roles in the United States is extremely selective, failing the vast majority of engineers.
Candidates reported having very negative feelings for Slack's Build and Release Engineer interview process in United States.