There is currently a work-from-home policy, but since the acquisition, conditions have been steadily worsening. RSU cuts have already occurred, resulting in a significant hit to employees’ salaries, and I’ve seen Glassdoor comments from people reporting they were asked to work in a hybrid model during interviews.
The company has senior engineers roles without a strong computer science foundation. Many are proficient in one language and AWS but show gaps in core fundamentals (OOP, design patterns, SLI/SLO/SLA, and Big-O analysis, etc). Technical discussions frequently stall on basics, and time is lost debating first principles with people whose skills align more with mid-level roles.
Decision-making tends to favor title over demonstrated expertise. If someone has “senior” in their title, their view often prevails even when the reasoning is weak. Management engagement is inconsistent; managers rarely intervene in meetings and can be out of touch with day-to-day team dynamics.
Confidence often outweighs correctness. Persuasive, buzzword-heavy arguments get traction under the banner of “diversity of opinions,” even when they lack technical rigor. This dynamic disproportionately hurts capable non-senior engineers: promotions slip when they raise valid objections or are less assertive in meetings.
The result is repeated poor decisions, declining morale, and a noticeable drop in service quality.
Stop hiring people just because they can throw AWS on their résumé or talk confidently in meetings.
Start valuing actual engineering knowledge and fundamentals again.
Typical HR screener, then technical interview. I solved everything the interviewer asked for but maybe they had too many qualified candidates so I got the rejection the next day. Overall a waste of time.
Telephonic interview 2 questions 1 hard problem or 2 problems. 2 problems, 1 was related to removing nth element in linked list. Extending that one problem was to write "atoi" function. Explicitly looking for execution and output. No hints.
A recruiter reached out to me followed by an initial 30 min screening call. After that they scheduled a 1hr call with engineering manager. It was followed by 1h of system design round and 1hr of DSA round, both on coderpad.
Typical HR screener, then technical interview. I solved everything the interviewer asked for but maybe they had too many qualified candidates so I got the rejection the next day. Overall a waste of time.
Telephonic interview 2 questions 1 hard problem or 2 problems. 2 problems, 1 was related to removing nth element in linked list. Extending that one problem was to write "atoi" function. Explicitly looking for execution and output. No hints.
A recruiter reached out to me followed by an initial 30 min screening call. After that they scheduled a 1hr call with engineering manager. It was followed by 1h of system design round and 1hr of DSA round, both on coderpad.