I applied as usual via their site and received an automated response. A few weeks later, I was sent a generic email asking me to complete a psychometric test and an aptitude test, which I did.
The tests show you the results. Apparently, I'm very clever as I was above average on the aptitude questions (it was all the usual basic puzzles, sequences, etc.), and the psychometric test spewed out some "results" as well.
It seems they take the psychometric tests seriously, as over a month later, I received another generic email letting me down gently. It contained the usual lazy "We have so many applications to deal with that we can't spend 30 seconds explaining our reasons."
Seeing as psychometric tests are no more useful than horoscopes or "Which Harry Potter house do you belong in?" quizzes, I was surprised that a company I'd presume to be as modern and progressive as Spotify would put any faith in them. They clearly liked my CV and I did well on the aptitude tests. They hadn't bothered to speak to me one-on-one at any point, so the decision must have been based on those.
Ultimately, it was a bit of a waste of time, although I guess I now know I don't want to work there.
Do you need to feel valued for the work you've done?
The following metrics were computed from 6 interview experiences for the Spotify Engineering Manager role in London, United Kingdom.
Spotify's interview process for their Engineering Manager roles in London, the United Kingdom is very selective, failing most engineers who go through it.
Candidates reported having very negative feelings for Spotify's Engineering Manager interview process in London, United Kingdom.