Competitive salary and stock options: Compensation is one of the strongest aspects here. If you perform well, you can earn a very solid salary, along with stock options that may grow in value.
Skilled and friendly colleagues: The team is generally professional, supportive, and pleasant to work with, which makes the day-to-day experience better despite the high pressure.
Remote-first flexibility: The company is remote friendly (even though there are some strict restrictions in time zone).
Opportunity to be part of something big; For those interested in fintech, it’s a chance to contribute to a fast-growing company with ambitious goals and a product that’s actively evolving.
The pace is intense, with constant pressure to deliver quickly, often at the cost of thoughtful execution. There’s a noticeable disconnect between management and engineering regarding the actual complexity and feasibility of tasks. While some teams may experience a slightly more relaxed pace, burnout and overwork remain common themes across the company, as even though nobody forces you to do so - you will have to work overtime almost on a daily basis to be able to get the work done.
Dependency bottlenecks between teams: Progress is regularly stalled by delays from other teams. For example, it’s common to be blocked for weeks or even months due to missing fixes or unmerged code, which creates a frustrating feedback loop.
Poor cross-team coordination: There’s a noticeable lack of structured communication, leading to misalignment and repeated back-and-forth that wastes time and energy. You will spend more time in constant meetings and cross-team blame, rather than do your actual work.
Work-life balance suffers: Long hours and high urgency expectations make it difficult to disconnect or maintain a sustainable routine.
Overall, this place can be good if you are ready for a chaotic and openly stressful startup.
The process was very straightforward and comfortable. The interviews with the hiring team, the technical team, and top managers were professional. The technical interview was product-oriented, and there was also a code review. Everything went smoothl
I had an initial HR interview at Tabby. While the recruiter was polite, the conversation felt generic and surface-level. Afterward, I received a standard rejection email with no feedback, which felt dismissive. Overall, the process came across as imp
It is given to you a precoded example written in Go that you need to find the problems in. They ask you questions about the decisions that you've made and what you could improve.
The process was very straightforward and comfortable. The interviews with the hiring team, the technical team, and top managers were professional. The technical interview was product-oriented, and there was also a code review. Everything went smoothl
I had an initial HR interview at Tabby. While the recruiter was polite, the conversation felt generic and surface-level. Afterward, I received a standard rejection email with no feedback, which felt dismissive. Overall, the process came across as imp
It is given to you a precoded example written in Go that you need to find the problems in. They ask you questions about the decisions that you've made and what you could improve.