Pros: Exciting work on ground-breaking projects. Great people and team members. Opportunity to lead front-end development efforts on the marketing and brand side. Nice position to leverage technical expertise on high-profile projects.

Cons: Not a lot of understanding of technical processes on the marketing/brand side, which created situations where constant education of the team was fundamental to moving development projects along. Pay is on the lower side. Production and DevOps needed much improvement. Communication with the core development team was non-existent.

Pros: Good company to work for.

Cons: Sometimes issues with management can be uncomfortable.

Pros: Despite the newspaper industry's revenue downturn, the Times has solid management who are hard at work to ensure the company's future. The Times has upgraded to modern OSS technology over the last three years—a big plus.

Cons: The Times froze salaries over the last couple of years. This makes moving to another company difficult if you're negotiating from a lower base pay than you ought to be getting if you were at another company. Don't expect to advance beyond the job you are hired unto, not unless you're ready to be both a software developer and a project manager. Project management at The Times is nearly non-existent, and the few there have little technical knowledge. Those who can both develop and manage their projects may eventually be anointed into management (read: lots of overtime, and then you're no longer a developer). Annual reviews are totally skewed. Employees are given an overall rating of 1-5, and 95% or more get a 3. A handful get a 4, and one or two get 5. People who get below a 3 are on their way out.