It's really comfortable in NYT; don't have to put too much effort.
Good for new grads, but not so much for mid-levels or higher.
It's a product company – not many technical challenges.
Limited tech stack, hard to onboard new tech products.
DevOps culture is non-existent (it's the engineers' problem along with QA).
Everything has to be Golang; nothing else can be justified.
Tech debt can be substantial.
Meetings, a lot of meetings.
I don't know why I keep applying to this company. This was the third time I've applied over several years to various departments, and each time I canceled the interview process due to bad experiences or better job offers. This particular interview wa
30-minute recruiter screening, followed by a 30-minute hiring manager screening the next week. Then, a 30-minute technical assessment the week after that, using Coderpad. Everything was going great. I did well on the assessment, and then the recruit
The interview process is super easy (coding part at least), but the people who do the technical leads in the interview are bad at what they do, repeating questions in multiple rounds. No offer at the end of the day, and I would have rejected after t
I don't know why I keep applying to this company. This was the third time I've applied over several years to various departments, and each time I canceled the interview process due to bad experiences or better job offers. This particular interview wa
30-minute recruiter screening, followed by a 30-minute hiring manager screening the next week. Then, a 30-minute technical assessment the week after that, using Coderpad. Everything was going great. I did well on the assessment, and then the recruit
The interview process is super easy (coding part at least), but the people who do the technical leads in the interview are bad at what they do, repeating questions in multiple rounds. No offer at the end of the day, and I would have rejected after t