Upper management works just as hard as anyone else. There is a lot of excitement and energy that drives you every day. The transparency is unprecedented. The semi-yearly performance reviews ensure top talent rises. Every engineering team is brilliant and fascinating in its own right. There's so much impact to make on a daily basis, and you are challenged to take risks and make a difference. And you will be rewarded for it.
There should be more of a focus on education and training, especially for new hires. Not everyone is going to realistically be self-driven enough to accelerate their learning and start contributing right away. But investing in training will benefit new hires and the engineering organization as a whole.
We need to get more aggressive with our recruiting. There are incredible positions to fill, and we should find ways to make ourselves more appealing to top candidates.
Offer higher referral bounties for certain positions. Offer signing bonuses or incentives to interview with us.
Once we get candidates in the door and informed about our technology and potential, it's really difficult to turn us down.
After the initial phone screen, I had a phone interview with two software engineers. Using Coderpad.io, I was asked to program a solution for two problems. They had preprepared these problems with some existing boilerplate code. I struggled with a po
Tough but fair. I thought it could have been more involved, but they seemed to have their ideal candidate in mind before the interview began. I would interview again for an engineering role.
The team is low-speed and low-efficiency. I had my first phone interview two months ago and only heard back about the onsite about two weeks ago. The interview process was just okay, but they seemed to only have one acceptable answer, without conside
After the initial phone screen, I had a phone interview with two software engineers. Using Coderpad.io, I was asked to program a solution for two problems. They had preprepared these problems with some existing boilerplate code. I struggled with a po
Tough but fair. I thought it could have been more involved, but they seemed to have their ideal candidate in mind before the interview began. I would interview again for an engineering role.
The team is low-speed and low-efficiency. I had my first phone interview two months ago and only heard back about the onsite about two weeks ago. The interview process was just okay, but they seemed to only have one acceptable answer, without conside