Young, open-minded, dynamic, sustainable, and very inclusive.
Hard to grow, few positions.
Value people a little bit more personally, not strictly following interviewing rules.
Initially, the selection process seemed interesting, but some things got out of hand. I participated in a 4-hour dynamics session with professionals from various sectors. Two specific moments were disappointing, in my opinion: * **Hands-on Coding
The interview consisted of: * Two algorithmic rounds, which were medium difficulty (LeetCode). * One low-level design round, testing object-oriented programming in C++. * One system design round, focused on designing an elevator system for a multi-b
The interview process was quite good. The interviewer was friendly and probably had large Crocs. They asked me 7 questions in total, and I was able to answer 6 of them.
Initially, the selection process seemed interesting, but some things got out of hand. I participated in a 4-hour dynamics session with professionals from various sectors. Two specific moments were disappointing, in my opinion: * **Hands-on Coding
The interview consisted of: * Two algorithmic rounds, which were medium difficulty (LeetCode). * One low-level design round, testing object-oriented programming in C++. * One system design round, focused on designing an elevator system for a multi-b
The interview process was quite good. The interviewer was friendly and probably had large Crocs. They asked me 7 questions in total, and I was able to answer 6 of them.