Good for engineers, tons of cool folks, and free food.
Too much technology churn, too much "in-house" engineering, which is later thrown away, too much bureaucracy during performance review, too much whining from junior engineers, lack of advancement opportunities above Sr. 2 level. It's not even clear what it takes.
Don't turn a good "Pay by Performance" idea into "Fit-into-budget" trivia.
One phone screening Five rounds of face-to-face interviews at Uber ATG SF office: The phone round was a typical algorithms question. Face-to-face: Round 1: Manager interview Round 2: Coding. The interviewer literally looked up some question bank
The process itself was straightforward. The onsite interview consisted of system design, algorithm & design, coding, and tech feedback rounds. What was horrible was my experience with the recruiter. She had no respect for my time throughout the proc
Sent my profile and got scheduled for the phone interview. The interviewer was a very junior person and had no interviewing skills. It was not clear from the interview what I was supposed to do, either design or coding. Finally, I spent 1 hour in tot
One phone screening Five rounds of face-to-face interviews at Uber ATG SF office: The phone round was a typical algorithms question. Face-to-face: Round 1: Manager interview Round 2: Coding. The interviewer literally looked up some question bank
The process itself was straightforward. The onsite interview consisted of system design, algorithm & design, coding, and tech feedback rounds. What was horrible was my experience with the recruiter. She had no respect for my time throughout the proc
Sent my profile and got scheduled for the phone interview. The interviewer was a very junior person and had no interviewing skills. It was not clear from the interview what I was supposed to do, either design or coding. Finally, I spent 1 hour in tot