Process
Phone call with recruiter.
Online test with the bot and the live coding session.
Phone call with recruiter.
The next stage is a technical interview.
Final stage with HR specialist.
Questions
Manual testing tasks
Unit tests
Was this helpful?
Interview Statistics
The following metrics were computed from 1 interview experience for the Visa QA Engineer role in Warsaw, Masovian Voivodeship.
Success Rate
0%
Pass Rate
Visa's interview process for their QA Engineer roles in Warsaw, Masovian Voivodeship is extremely selective, failing the vast majority of engineers.
Experience Rating
Positive100%
Neutral0%
Negative0%
Candidates reported having very good feelings for Visa's QA Engineer interview process in Warsaw, Masovian Voivodeship.
Visa Work Experiences
2.0
Controlling Management, Low Standards
QA Engineer • Current Employee
Warsaw, Masovian Voivodeship, Poland
September 21, 2024
Pros: Only one possibility: a well-known brand.
Cons: - Unprofessional, controlling management that does not solve the root problems. Instead, it tries to manage through pressure and hypercontrol over people.
- Low technical standards. Your day-to-day work will differ from the agreements listed in the contract. Be prepared for degradation.
- Specialists are not valued. Result: high staff turnover.
2.0
The worst company I ever worked for in my life!
QA Engineer • Former Employee
Foster City, California, United States
February 8, 2014
Pros: Decent pay and opportunity for OT when needed.
Cons: Treat contractors as second-class citizens: No workspace was provided for the first two months. We had to drift around looking for a place to sit. They made us work until 5 AM on occasion and on weekends without any consideration for our personal lives. The team lead was rude, using profanities and being emotionally abusive.
5.0
Better Than Any, But Busy
QA Engineer • Current Employee
London, England, United Kingdom
July 28, 2022
Pros: Nice, well, better than any.
Cons: Busy, stress, quick work of.
- 2.0Controlling Management, Low StandardsQA Engineer • Current EmployeeWarsaw, Masovian Voivodeship, PolandSeptember 21, 2024Pros: Only one possibility: a well-known brand.Cons: - Unprofessional, controlling management that does not solve the root problems. Instead, it tries to manage through pressure and hypercontrol over people. - Low technical standards. Your day-to-day work will differ from the agreements listed in the contract. Be prepared for degradation. - Specialists are not valued. Result: high staff turnover.
- 2.0The worst company I ever worked for in my life!QA Engineer • Former EmployeeFoster City, California, United StatesFebruary 8, 2014Pros: Decent pay and opportunity for OT when needed.Cons: Treat contractors as second-class citizens: No workspace was provided for the first two months. We had to drift around looking for a place to sit. They made us work until 5 AM on occasion and on weekends without any consideration for our personal lives. The team lead was rude, using profanities and being emotionally abusive.
- 5.0Better Than Any, But BusyQA Engineer • Current EmployeeLondon, England, United KingdomJuly 28, 2022Pros: Nice, well, better than any.Cons: Busy, stress, quick work of.
Visa Interview Questions
Explore Interview QuestionsTaro 75Google Interview QuestionsMeta Interview QuestionsAmazon Interview QuestionsApple Interview QuestionsNetflix Interview Questions
Explore Interview ExperiencesOpenAI Interview ExperiencesAnthropic Interview ExperiencesPerplexity Interview ExperiencesWindsurf Interview ExperiencesMistral AI Interview Experiences
