Software Developer Interview Experience - Roorkee, India
September 1, 2022
Positive ExperienceGot Offer
Process
The interview was easy. Basic DSA (Data Structures and Algorithms) was asked.
The approach was given weightage over the exact solution.
The interviewer was very friendly. It was an HR cum technical interview.
The interview was rather easy. Just be understanding of what's being asked.
Questions
Describe a time when you felt like you couldn't achieve a desired outcome, and how did you deal with that?
Was this helpful?
Interview Statistics
The following metrics were computed from 1 interview experience for the Visa Software Developer role in Roorkee, Uttarakhand.
Success Rate
100%
Pass Rate
Visa's interview process for their Software Developer roles in Roorkee, Uttarakhand is incredibly easy as the vast majority of engineers get an offer after going through it.
Experience Rating
Positive100%
Neutral0%
Negative0%
Candidates reported having very good feelings for Visa's Software Developer interview process in Roorkee, Uttarakhand.
Visa Work Experiences
4.0
Austin CyberSource Product Development
Software Developer • Current Employee
Austin, Texas, United States
June 5, 2015
Pros: - Very engaging products and features.
- Teams are very close-knit and family-like, highly collaborative.
- Developers are very knowledgeable and passionate about what they are working on.
- The group is very fun to be around.
- Not afraid to make mistakes and learn from them.
- Stays up to date with the latest technologies and trends.
- Open to new ideas.
Cons: - Existing employees are not being level-set with new employees in terms of compensation, even though skill sets, experience, and job requirements are the same.
- Teams are expected to take on more and more work without the expected growth to support it.
5.0
Amazing People, Great Culture
Software Developer • Former Employee
Bengaluru, Karnataka, India
December 4, 2020
Pros: Nice work culture. Amazing people.
Cons: no cons of working in this company
2.0
Little respect for developers
Software Developer • Former Employee
Paddington, England, United Kingdom
February 14, 2017
Pros: * Good company to have on your CV.
* Training was good (though the budget was being reduced in my last year).
* Decent benefits.
Cons: For a company which relies heavily on technology, the management had low respect for permanent development staff. There were two avenues of promotion available to technical staff, whereas there were countless opportunities for management. Management felt that technical staff could easily be replaced with insourced/outsourced staff.
Top heavy. Some projects had the same number of managers as development staff. Some teams consisted of one manager who had one "resource".
Some projects had unrealistic deadlines due to poor prior planning.
- 4.0Austin CyberSource Product DevelopmentSoftware Developer • Current EmployeeAustin, Texas, United StatesJune 5, 2015Pros: - Very engaging products and features. - Teams are very close-knit and family-like, highly collaborative. - Developers are very knowledgeable and passionate about what they are working on. - The group is very fun to be around. - Not afraid to make mistakes and learn from them. - Stays up to date with the latest technologies and trends. - Open to new ideas.Cons: - Existing employees are not being level-set with new employees in terms of compensation, even though skill sets, experience, and job requirements are the same. - Teams are expected to take on more and more work without the expected growth to support it.
- 5.0Amazing People, Great CultureSoftware Developer • Former EmployeeBengaluru, Karnataka, IndiaDecember 4, 2020Pros: Nice work culture. Amazing people.Cons: no cons of working in this company
- 2.0Little respect for developersSoftware Developer • Former EmployeePaddington, England, United KingdomFebruary 14, 2017Pros: * Good company to have on your CV. * Training was good (though the budget was being reduced in my last year). * Decent benefits.Cons: For a company which relies heavily on technology, the management had low respect for permanent development staff. There were two avenues of promotion available to technical staff, whereas there were countless opportunities for management. Management felt that technical staff could easily be replaced with insourced/outsourced staff. Top heavy. Some projects had the same number of managers as development staff. Some teams consisted of one manager who had one "resource". Some projects had unrealistic deadlines due to poor prior planning.
Visa Interview Questions
Explore Interview QuestionsTaro 75Google Interview QuestionsMeta Interview QuestionsAmazon Interview QuestionsApple Interview QuestionsNetflix Interview Questions
Explore Interview ExperiencesOpenAI Interview ExperiencesAnthropic Interview ExperiencesPerplexity Interview ExperiencesWindsurf Interview ExperiencesMistral AI Interview Experiences
